Volvo V8 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2016

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Chevy V8 cams....

The only drawback to the 305 engine is the bore to stroke relationship. If my memory serves me correctly the 305 had a 3&7/8" bore (Stroked 283)and was better suited to rpms below 5800. They were not an engine that had much bottom end strength either. Why not a 350 cid? Swapping in a late model 327 large journal crank makes a bullet proof 302 that will run at 7000+ all day!

I agree with the other post that talked about making other mods that would affect breathing before re-camming. Trash the stock heads (.178" intakes) in favor of some .194" intakes at least before sticking in a radical cam. The old 350 hp 350 cam from TRW is about as strong as you want with the stock compression and no balancing on the lower end.

Regards,


--
Will Dallas, www.willdallas.us, www.willdallas.org, www.willdallas.com 86 245 DL 205K miles, 93 940 250K miles, 88 765 GLE 149K miles, 86 244 DL 200K Miles, 88 744T 200K miles






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Chevy V8 cams....
posted by  someone claiming to be Adrian  on Sat Jul 16 08:34 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.