Volvo RWD 120-130 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2005 120-130 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Replacing a 122... 120-130 1966

I'll second Johns opinions on 1800's. Yes, they are beautiful, but really just a heavier 122 that are much harder to work on. (everything is very tight in the engine compartment and under the dash...in comparison to 122's)
Where I differ is the 140's. They offer the simple mechanicals of the 120's but with some upgrades, mainly rear discs and a better booster. Also better outward visibility, a stronger structure( I believe) and a ton of trunk space. Of course he is right the 122's have a more charming vintage look.
The 5444's I've never had so I can't speak for them.
In the end the best choice probably comes down to the "what is the best car, (condition wise) you can find at the time that best fills your needs." i.e. a great 122 is better than a rusty beat up 142 and a perfect 1800 is no good if it is over your budget and you can't fir your family or stuff in it.
my 2cents






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Replacing a 122... [120-130][1966]
posted by  Dylan Berichon  on Thu Aug 8 01:58 CST 2013 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.