Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2023

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Was 1971 a good year for the 164?

posted by  122 and 940 and too many on  Tue Dec 3 13:34 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Mon Apr 25 13:12 CST 2011
[RELATED]

Sounds nice, though I'm eccentric and like them on narrow wheels and tyres. Most of the time anyway. I just love it when they're sufficiently under tyred that you can really lose the back end big time. That's on Bilstein sports, IPD front bar, no rear, M41,

I'm messing with a B18 PV at the moment. Narrowed 140 rear axle with disk brakes all round. Limited slip diff, and a very low ratio rear end, 4.8/1. Its hilarious to squirt away from roundabouts in it. Because of the diff it's ultra quick off the mark. It'll beat just about any hot hatch. That's on Bilstein sports, IPD front bar, no rear, M41,


You get these modern car owners in their expensive cars and it's getting away from them. Boy do they get pissed.


Regards


Pete






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Was 1971 a good year for the 164? [140-160]
posted by  Lord Volvo subscriber  on Tue Dec 3 04:32 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.