Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2004 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Was 1971 a good year for the 164? 140-160

posted by  Lord Volvo on  Tue Dec 3 04:32 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Sat Oct 4 15:55 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Does anybody here own a 1971 164? I owned a '71 142 years ago and would like to get a 164 assuming that the interior is identical (horizontal speedo - loved that thing!) as is the rear end, but has the bigger engine and funky nose.

Mechanically, what should I look out for? After doing some research here in the archives, it seems like I should go for the manual tranny with OD (M410?), but there is debate over FI vs. carbs. I'm assuming the 164E wasn't available until 1972. Some say the stock carbs left something to be desired.

Guess I'm looking for some reflections from the 164 crowd out there on what they like and dislike about them, especially the 1971 year.

Thanks much.
--
Mike F - 1984 244 DL - 216,000 miles (give or take)






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Was 1971 a good year for the 164? [140-160]
posted by  Lord Volvo subscriber  on Tue Dec 3 04:32 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.