Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2005 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Converting 2.4 to 3.1. What do I have to replace? 200 1990

Art,

Yes the thick film AMM is slower to respond than the "hotwire" LH 2.4 AMM but both were too slow to meet emissions and meet cost targets (cost is an assumption on my part).

The way I found out about the physical differences between the LH 2.4 and LH 3.1 throttle bodies was that I "assumed" they were the same, I spent many hours polishing the exterior of an LH 2.4 TB to a mirror finish (bling if you like) and installed it on the car along with the 2.4 switch. Once I started the car, I got the appropriate error of a bad throttle position sensor from the ECU, dug through the books and found the sensor vs. switch difference.

I tried to replace the switch with the sensor and it would not seat against the TB... poop, I know have a shiny paper weight for my desk! I installed the LH 3.1 TB and all was good along with the sensor, just no "bling".

jorrell


--
92 245 299.3K miles, IPD'd to the hilt, 06 XC70, 00 Eclipse custom Turbo setup...currently taking names and kicking reputations!






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Converting 2.4 to 3.1. What do I have to replace? [200][1990]
posted by  someone claiming to be Benzo  on Thu Nov 18 04:58 CST 2010 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.