Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2003 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Wait a minute... 140-160

tim asked if 1.5 would be ideal. i was just pointing out how it wouldn't work with a b30. i think 1.8:1 is a good ratio too, just with the heavy stock rods and pistons or stock rods and some custom pistons he will not be able to lighten the rotating assembly signifagantly. the longer he increases the rod ratio the lighter the assembly will be , the more responsive it will be . also with the longer rods and shorter piston compresion hieght he will get less rod angularity and less piston rock. so he will get a better ring seal.

do you think the stock rods will be ok for a 400hp b30. i have bent stock rods in a b20 when my dizzy exploded and let the advance go all the way out. i put it into nuetral and let of te gas after only a couple of second. but bent the rods from that couple seconds of detonation. i think in tuning the motor he will see detonation atleast a couple of times.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New My Turbo 164 project [140-160]
posted by  Tim164  on Tue Jan 23 22:20 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.