Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2002 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B18 or B20 140-160

Paul, with great respect, anecdotal evidence is not worth much. Volvo decided the B20 was a worthwhile improvement, in fact they planned for 2 liters when the B18 was first cast.
My engine building experience is not limited to Volvo engines. Displacement is always a means to increasing torque, which is what increases horsepower.
Obviously the B18 can be made into a powerful engine. The B20 can be made more powerful. Volvo R-sport bored them out even bigger - for more power.
It's the North American way - bigger is better. I built a 427 Ford Cobra replica a few years back. I thought the 427 was a bit small, and very expensive. I built a 460 cubic inch engine, when others said it would be a waste of time. Guess what - I beat a 300 pound lighter, 427 powered replica that everyone thought was the big dog on the block - until it met my 460. Yep, anecdotal I know.
I'd still go with the B20, which until 1974 had essentially the same rods as the B18.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New B18 or B20 [140-160]
posted by  alschnertz subscriber  on Tue Jul 19 15:25 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.