Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2006 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

B18 or B20 140-160

Yes capacity makes more torque, but heavier parts use it up again. The guy is asking about stock engines using a C cam. In both cases the limiting factor is firstly the cam & secondly the cylinder head. The bored out/high performance R-sport engines you speak of use a drastically modified cylinder head.

My engine building experience is not limited to Volvo engines.

Mine neither. I've rebuilt GM's as large as 645 cubic inch/cylinder & GE's that run all day at 28psi of boost.... big deal

I built a 427 Ford Cobra replica a few years back. I thought the 427 was a bit small, and very expensive. I built a 460 cubic inch engine

I have a customer who has a Marcos powered by a B18 with one of my camshafts that regularly beats genuine 427 Cobras at events. I'll bet it would beat your 460 Cobra too because anything with that much iron of the front axle is only good in a straight line.

I'd still go with the B20, which until 1974 had essentially the same rods as the B18.

You obviously haven't done much with B18's because they have lighter rods than the early B20's even though they use the same bearing.










THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New B18 or B20 [140-160]
posted by  alschnertz subscriber  on Tue Jul 19 15:25 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.