|
And that 40% only allows for the losses pre ignition from fuel that was not in the right place to be useful at ignition.
Then after ignition we have a whole lot more power lost from expanding gases escaping and not driving the pistons.
Maybe 30 % again?
But they are not additive, it is not worse by 69% (30% plus 30% plus 9%)
At ignition I have 70%
I lose 30% of 70% (21%) on power stroke from escaping gases leaves me 49%
and I lose 9% from lower compression regardless (of 49% =5%)
I am left with 44% efficiency.
So MPG is lower than half.
Can that be right (it certainly was thirsty).
Am I missing something obvious?
|